jump to navigation

President Supports Islamic Sharia March 17, 2009

Posted by suppose in Politics, economics, Uncategorized.
add a comment
PT type=”text/javascript” SRC=”‘+ ‘http://c2l.media.newsworthyaudio.com/Partners/’ + ‘WashingtonTimes’ + ‘/Audio/WashingtonTimes/’ + ‘news_2009_mar_17_embracing-of-shariah’ + ‘.js’ +’”></SCR’ + ‘IPT>’);
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, speaks during a ceremony marking the 30th anniversary of the 1979 Islamic revolution that toppled the U.S.-backed late Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi and brought hard-line clerics to power, in Tehran on Tuesday Feb, 10, 2009. Iran welcomed talks with the new administration of U.S. President Barack Obama on the basis of mutual respect, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said. <!–

  • Download
  • –><!–

  • Translate
  • –> 
    COMMENTARY:

    President Obama on Friday reiterated for the umpteenth time his determination to develop a “new relationship” with the Muslim world. On this occasion, the audience were the leaders of Saudi Arabia, Indonesia and the Philippines.

    Unfortunately, it increasingly appears that, in so doing, he will be embracing the agenda of the Muslim Brotherhood – an organization dedicated to promoting the theo-political-legal program authoritative Islam calls Shariah and that has the self-described mission of “destroying Western civilization from within.”

    As part of Mr. Obama’s “Respect Islam” campaign, he will travel to Turkey in early April. While there, he will not only pay tribute to an Islamist government that has systematically wrested every institution from the secular tradition of Kemal Ataturk and put the country squarely on the path to Islamification. He will also participate in something called the “Alliance of Civilizations.”

    The Alliance is a United Nations-sponsored affair that reflects – as, increasingly do most things the United Nations is involved in – the views of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC). The OIC is made up of 57 Muslim-majority nations. Thanks to support from Saudi Arabia and its proxies, the Muslim Brotherhood has become a driving force within the Conference and their agendas largely coincide.

    For example, in 2005 a communique issued after a summit in Mecca declared: “The Conference underlined the need to collectively endeavor to reflect the noble Islamic values, counter Islamophobia, defamation of Islam and its values and desecration of Islamic holy sites, and to effectively coordinate with states as well as regional and international institutions and organizations to urge them to criminalize this phenomenon as a form of racism.”

    Ominously, as part of its bid to “criminalize” Islamophobia, the OIC is seeking “deterrent punishments.” It insists that not only freedom of expression but all human rights be circumscribed by the OIC’s 1990 Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam, which concludes with the caveat that, “All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic Shariah.” Translation: Liberties enshrined in the United Nations’ foundational Universal Declaration of Human Rights are largely rendered null and void.

    The demand that no criticism of Islam be permitted is the pre-eminent feature of the Muslim Brotherhood’s efforts in the West. In fact, it is but the leading edge of the Brothers’ bid to suppress public awareness of the threat posed by their program in societies that pride themselves on religious tolerance, thereby facilitating seditious penetration and influence operations by the Shariah-adherent.

    A playbook for the latter can be found in a publication issued last fall by the U.S.-Muslim Engagement Project being aggressively promoted to the Obama administration and Congress by a number of its non-Muslim participants. Notably, former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright recently effusively presented to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee the Project’s book titled “Changing Course: A New Direction for U.S. Relations with the Muslim World.” Former Minnesota Rep. Vin Weber did the same at Grover Norquist’s weekly meeting of conservative activists last week.

    Underwritten largely by George Soros’ and other left-wing foundations, “Changing Course” seems to reflect predominantly the recommendations of groups the government has established are Muslim Brotherhood fronts, such as the Islamic Society of North America and the Muslim Public Affairs Council. Both are represented in the Engagement Project’s “Leadership Group.” Accordingly, its book calls for:

    c “Engagement with groups that have clearly demonstrated a commitment to nonviolent participation in politics” (read, the Brotherhood).

    c “Not equat[ing] reform with secularism, nor … assum[ing] that reformers who advocate some form of Shariah as the basis for the rule of law will inevitably abuse human rights or adopt anti-American policies.”

    c “Not supply[ing] additional ammunition to extremists by linking the term ‘Islam’ or key tenets of the religion of Islam with the actions of extremist or terrorist groups.”

    c Launching “an education program comparable in scale” to “the more than $7 billion” invested in the “post-Sputnik U.S. commitment to math and science education” to “education on Islam and Muslims, sustained over a decade or more, focused on teacher training and curriculum in middle and high schools, and colleges.”

    Emboldened by the promise of this influence operation and the apparent willingness of the Obama administration to embrace the Muslim Brotherhood’s agenda – in part, if not in its entirety – the organization’s assorted fronts in America are becoming ever more audacious.

    In response to a long-overdue decision taken by the FBI last year to terminate “sensitivity training” of its agents by one of the most prominent of these fronts, the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), assorted Brotherhood groups and operatives reportedly intend to announce that Muslims will henceforth cease any and all cooperation with U.S. law enforcement until CAIR is rehabilitated.

    Such a step would call into question the patriotism of the many Muslims in America who do not embrace the Brotherhood’s Shariah agenda – something that would, presumably, be as offensive to them as it would be troubling to the rest of us. It could also expose those engaged in it to criminal charges of “misprision of felony,” conspiring to withhold information from the authorities concerning terrorist operations and activities in the Muslim community.

    The message should go forth: Friends of the Muslim Brotherhood are no friends of America. We follow their guidance at our peril.

    Frank J. Gaffney Jr. is president of the Center for Security Policy and a columnist for The Washington Times.

    widget(url) { var ct=”; var temp = document.getElementsByTagName(‘title’); if (temp!=null && temp.length>0) {ct=temp[0].text;} document.write(‘<scr’+'ipt type=”text/javascript” src=”‘+url+’&ctxu=’+escape(document.location)+’&ctxt=’+escape(ct)+’”></scr’+'ipt>’); } yedda_render_widget(“http://yedda.com/api/widgets/?d=517&mt=4&mt.qht=GAFFNEY: Embracing of Shariah?”);


    Got a question about GAFFNEY: Embracing of Shariah?? Type your question here…

      • L. Paul Bremer, the former U.S. administrator in Iraq, is an artist. For the past two years, the one-time diplomat has been painting bucolic landscapes inspired by trips to the Maryland countryside and his vacation house in Vermont. He recently posted his art on a Web site (www.bremerenterprises.com) after selling about half of his canvases at an exhibition in Vermont in September.

      <!–
      OAS_AD(‘x04′);
      //–>

      SetC2LVisibility(‘WashingtonTimes’,'WashingtonTimes’,'news_2009_mar_17_embracing-of-shariah’,'C2LContainer’,'C2LContainer2′);

      <!–
      OAS_AD(‘Position1′);
      //–>

      <!–
      OAS_AD(‘Right1′);
      //–>

      var ACE_AR = {Site: ‘725976′, Size: ‘160600′};

      var encSrc =
      ‘<object classid=\”clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000\” ‘ +
      ‘codebase=\”http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=3,0,0,0\” ‘ +
      ‘id=\”obj45122\” width=\”160\” height=\”600\”>’ +
      ‘<param name=\”movie\” value=\”http://media.contextweb.com/creatives/KAP360_WAWT_DRCollegeA_160×600.swf?clickTag=http://cdslog.contextweb.com/CDSLogger/L.aspx?q=C~501725~1163~26557~45122~27099~2~285~21~washingtontimes.com~2~8~1~0~2~1~9URVU8vzp91IW38Jn-ZKFJlNySJ_b7qT~40~1~FuHATJfK~N1lcRh6f~1~1~1~~http%3a%2f%2fclk.atdmt.com%2fDEN%2fgo%2f128412084%2fdirect%3bat.128412084_DRCollegeA_160×600%3bct.1%2f01%2f2106104650\”>’ +
      ‘<param name=”allowScr’ + ‘iptAccess” value=”always”><param name=\”wmode\” value=\”opaque\”>’ +
      ‘<param name=\”quality\” value=\”autohigh\”><param name=\”bgcolor\” value=\”#FFFFFF\”>’ +
      ‘<embed src=\”http://media.contextweb.com/creatives/KAP360_WAWT_DRCollegeA_160×600.swf?clickTag=http://cdslog.contextweb.com/CDSLogger/L.aspx?q=C~501725~1163~26557~45122~27099~2~285~21~washingtontimes.com~2~8~1~0~2~1~9URVU8vzp91IW38Jn-ZKFJlNySJ_b7qT~40~1~FuHATJfK~N1lcRh6f~1~1~1~~http%3a%2f%2fclk.atdmt.com%2fDEN%2fgo%2f128412084%2fdirect%3bat.128412084_DRCollegeA_160×600%3bct.1%2f01%2f2106104650\” width=\”160\” height=\”600\” wmode=\”opaque\” ‘ +
      ‘allowScr’ + ‘iptAccess=\”always\” type=\”application/x-shockwave-flash\” swLiveConnect=\”false\” quality=\”autohigh\” ‘ +
      ‘pluginspace=\”http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash\”>’ +
      ‘</embed></object>’;
      var plugin = false,
      hasPatch = false;
      with (navigator.userAgent)
      if (indexOf(‘MSIE’) > -1 && parseInt(substring(indexOf(‘MSIE’) + 5).split(‘ ‘)[0]) >= 6)
      hasPatch = true;
      if (navigator.mimeTypes && navigator.mimeTypes['application/x-shockwave-flash'] &&
      navigator.mimeTypes['application/x-shockwave-flash'].enabledPlugin) {
      if (navigator.plugins && navigator.plugins['Shockwave Flash'] &&
      parseInt(navigator.plugins['Shockwave Flash'].description.substring(navigator.plugins['Shockwave Flash'].description.indexOf(‘.’) – 1)) >= 8)
      plugin = true;
      } else if (navigator.userAgent && navigator.userAgent.indexOf(‘MSIE’) >= 0 &&
      (navigator.userAgent.indexOf(‘Windows’) >= 0) &&
      (navigator.userAgent.indexOf(‘Windows 3.1′) < 0)) {
      var flashA = (new String(‘8′)).split(‘.’);
      if ((flashV = parseInt(flashA[0])) < 3) flashV = 3;
      else if (flashA[1] && parseInt(flashA[1]) > 0) flashV++;
      document.writeln(‘<scr’ + ‘ipt language=”vbscript”>’);
      document.writeln(‘on error resume next ‘);
      document.writeln(‘if (plugin <= 0) then plugin = (IsObject(CreateObject(“ShockwaveFlash.ShockwaveFlash.’ + flashV + ‘”)))’);
      document.writeln(‘</scr’ + ‘ipt>’);
      }
      if (plugin) {
      if (hasPatch && document.getElementById(‘aamx45122′)) {
      document.write(‘<div id=”fDiv45122″ style=”display:none”>’ +
      encodeURI(‘document.write(\” + encSrc + ‘\’)') + ‘</div>’);
      document.write(‘<div id=”iDiv45122″ style=”display:none”>’ +
      encodeURI(‘<body><script src=”javascript:decodeURI(parent.document.getElementById(\” +
      ‘fDiv45122\’).innerHTML)”></scr’ + ‘ipt></body>’) + ‘</div>’);
      document.write(‘<div id=”renderDiv45122″ style=”position:relative”></div>’);
      document.write(‘<iframe id=”renderIfr45122″ style=”display:none” ‘ +
      ’src=”javascript:decodeURI(parent.document.getElementById(\’iDiv45122\’).innerHTML)” ‘ +
      ‘onload=”javascript:document.getElementById(\’renderDiv45122\’).’ +
      ‘insertAdjacentElement(\’beforeEnd\’, window.frames[\'renderIfr45122\'].’ +
      ‘document.getElementById(\’obj45122\’))”></iframe>’);
      } else document.write(decodeURI(encSrc));
      } else if (!(navigator.appName && navigator.appName.indexOf(‘Netscape’) > -1 &&
      navigator.appVersion.indexOf(‘2.’) > -1))
      document.writeln(‘<a href=\”http://cdslog.contextweb.com/CDSLogger/L.aspx?q=C~501725~1163~26557~45122~27099~2~285~21~washingtontimes.com~2~8~1~0~2~1~9URVU8vzp91IW38Jn-ZKFJlNySJ_b7qT~40~1~FuHATJfK~N1lcRh6f~1~1~1~~http%3a%2f%2fclk.atdmt.com%2fDEN%2fgo%2f128412084%2fdirect%3bat.128412084_DRCollegeA_160×600%3bct.1%2f01%2f2106104650\”><img src=\”http://media.contextweb.com/creatives/KAP360_WAWT_DRObsoleteB_160×600.gif\” alt=\”\” width=\”160\” height=\”600\” border=\”0\”></a>’);
      &lt;a href=”http://cdslog.contextweb.com/CDSLogger/L.aspx?q=C~501725~1163~26557~45122~27099~2~285~21~washingtontimes.com~2~8~1~0~2~1~9URVU8vzp91IW38Jn-ZKFJlNySJ_b7qT~40~1~FuHATJfK~N1lcRh6f~1~1~1~~http%3a%2f%2fclk.atdmt.com%2fDEN%2fgo%2f128412084%2fdirect%3bat.128412084_DRCollegeA_160×600%3bct.1%2f01%2f2106104650″&gt; &lt;img src=”http://media.contextweb.com/creatives/KAP360_WAWT_DRObsoleteB_160×600.gif” alt=”" width=”160″ height=”600″ border=”0″&gt; &lt;/a&gt; <a href=”http://cdslog.contextweb.com/CDSLogger/L.aspx?q=C~501725~1163~26557~45122~27099~2~285~21~washingtontimes.com~2~8~1~0~2~1~9URVU8vzp91IW38Jn-ZKFJlNySJ_b7qT~40~1~FuHATJfK~N1lcRh6f~1~1~1~~http%3a%2f%2fclk.atdmt.com%2fDEN%2fgo%2f128412084%2fdirect%3bat.128412084_DRCollegeA_160×600%3bct.1%2f01%2f2106104650″> <img src=”http://media.contextweb.com/creatives/KAP360_WAWT_DRObsoleteB_160×600.gif” alt=”" width=”160″ height=”600″ border=”0″> </a>

      <!–
      OAS_AD(‘Right2′);
      //–>

      var TFSMFlash_PRETAG=”";
      var TFSMFlash_POSTTAG=”";
      var TFSMFlash_VERSION=”6″;
      var TFSMFlash_WMODE=”window”;
      var TFSMFlash_OASCLICK=”http://oascentral.washtimes.com/RealMedia/ads/click_lx.ads/www.washingtontimes.com/story/wire-columns/L42/1571238119/Right2/washtimes/Obamabook_House_120×240/Obamabook_House_120×240_again.html/512b686a6f556d2f36563041436a2f42?http://www.washingtontimes.com/store/inauguration/”;
      var TFSMFlash_SWFCLICKVARIABLE=”?clickTAG=”+TFSMFlash_OASCLICK ;
      var TFSMFlash_SWFFILE=”http://imagec12.247realmedia.com/RealMedia/ads/Creatives/washtimes/Obamabook_House_120×240/obamabook2.swf/1232976717″+TFSMFlash_SWFCLICKVARIABLE;
      var TFSMFlash_FSCOMMAND=”";
      var TFSMFlash_IMAGEALTERNATE=”";
      var TFSMFlash_OASALTTEXT=”";
      var TFSMFlash_OASTARGET=”_blank”;
      var TFSMFlash_OASPROTOCOL=”http://”;
      var TFSMFlash_OASDIM=”WIDTH=’120′ HEIGHT=’240′”;
      var TFSMFlash_OASADID=”OAS_RMF_Right2_FLASH”;
      document.write(‘<scr’+'ipt src=”http://imagec12.247realmedia.com/RealMedia/ads/Creatives/washtimes/Obamabook_House_120×240/TFSMFlashWrapper204.js/1232976717″></scr’+'ipt>’);

      <!–
      OAS_AD(‘Right3′);
      //–>

      var sm_random = Math.round(Math.random()*1000000);
      var u = ”;
      var r = ”;
      try
      {
      u = encodeURIComponent(document.location);
      r = encodeURIComponent(document.referrer);
      }catch(e){}
      document.write(“<scr”+”ipt type=’text/javascript’ src=’http://afe.specificclick.net?l=1791086008&sz=160×600&wr=j&t=j&u=”+u+”&r=”+r+”&rnd=” + sm_random + “‘></scri”+”pt>”);

      <!–
      OAS_AD(‘BottomRight’);
      //–>
      <!–
      google_ad_client = “pub-9012993659965611″;
      /* Square Button (BottomRight) */
      google_ad_slot = “4466173081″;
      google_ad_width = 125;
      google_ad_height = 125;
      //–>

      window.google_render_ad();

      A Rerun—–Prophecy January 19, 2009

      Posted by suppose in Uncategorized.
      add a comment

      A Rerun—–Prophecy

      A borrowed economy June 30, 2007

      Posted by suppose in Uncategorized.
      trackback , edit post

      A long time ago in our nation’s history, 1929, 98% of the people thought the stock market would continue to go up, up, up. Unlike today only a small % of Americans owned stocks. Most of those were borrowing up to a 90% margin, i.e. 10% down and pay off the rest when the stock went up. A panic began. No one was sure what caused the panic, but stocks crashed and the dollar not only dropped, it almost disappeared because no one had any, NADA!

      Thus began a national depression that really didn’t end until the middle of World War II, and even then it was none too robust. Economists at that time, at least those that had champions in Congress, decreed the way to prevent depressions was to borrow to the hilt, cheapen the dollar so plenty were around, and build a strong central government in DC so the national economy could be “managed.”

      Today the US has borrowed so much over the years[expenditures exceed income, e.g. taxes] the government must borrow, i.e. sell bonds, which raises the interest rate. This eventually causes not only inflation but a strain on the economy. Which is where we are today.

      Personal debt in the US is at an all-time high. A spending frenzy has occurred in the last few years due to housing inflation, where homeowners have found they can borrow on their home equity and pay back when they sell the house at an increased price. A very temporary boost in discretionary spending happened and borrowers used the new found wealth to buy all sorts of necessary things, like autos, second homes, vacations, all kinds of electronic and communications gadgets, etc., etc.

      Chickens have come home to roost and the price will be paid soon with increasing inflation and a drop in discretionary spending, causing business activity to fall. The big government boys in DC will respond with ever cheaper money only making inflation worse and the stock market will respond with an 1987 kind of pull back in the value of equities. This time the drop may last a lot longer and many investors will be butchered and many wage earners will struggle.

      Batten down the hatches as best you can.

      ————————————————————————————–

      Another cover up on an Obama story November 2, 2008

      Posted by suppose in Uncategorized.
      add a comment

      Hidden Audio: Obama Tells SF Chronicle He Will Bankrupt Coal Industry

      (Please read update about the San Francisco Chronicle neglecting to mention Obama’s willingness to bankrupt the coal industry at bottom of this blog.)Imagine if John McCain had whispered somewhere that he was willing to bankrupt a major industry? Would this declaration not immediately be front page news? Well, Barack Obama actually flat out told the San Francisco Chronicle (SF Gate) that he was willing to see the coal industry go bankrupt in a January 17, 2008 interview. The result? Nothing. This audio interview has been hidden from the public…until now. Here is the transcript of Obama’s statement about bankrupting the coal industry (emphasis mine):

      Let me sort of describe my overall policy.

      What I’ve said is that we would put a cap and trade system in place that is as aggressive, if not more aggressive, than anybody else’s out there.

      I was the first to call for a 100% auction on the cap and trade system, which means that every unit of carbon or greenhouse gases emitted would be charged to the polluter. That will create a market in which whatever technologies are out there that are being presented, whatever power plants that are being built, that they would have to meet the rigors of that market and the ratcheted down caps that are being placed, imposed every year.

      So if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can; it’s just that it will bankrupt them because they’re going to be charged a huge sum for all that greenhouse gas that’s being emitted.

      Story Continues Below Ad ↓

      &lt;a href=”http://harvest.AdGardener.com/noscript.aspx?s=16&amp;c=fa99ab07-42c2-43e0-abfb-b47f96e4b9b9″ target=”_blank”&gt;&lt;img src=”http://harvest.AdGardener.com/noscript.aspx?s=16&amp;w=336&amp;h=280&amp;c=fa99ab07-42c2-43e0-abfb-b47f96e4b9b9″ width=”336″ height=”280″ border=”0″ /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

      That will also generate billions of dollars that we can invest in solar, wind, biodiesel and other alternative energy approaches.

      The only thing I’ve said with respect to coal, I haven’t been some coal booster. What I have said is that for us to take coal off the table as a (sic) ideological matter as opposed to saying if technology allows us to use coal in a clean way, we should pursue it.

      So if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can.

      It’s just that it will bankrupt them.

      Amazing that this statement by Obama about bankrupting the coal industry has been kept under wraps until this time.

      UPDATE: NewsBusters’ Tom Blumer has found out that the San Francisco Chronicle story published on January 18 based upon this January 17 interview did not include any mention of Obama’s willingness to bankrupt the coal industry which you can hear on the audio. You can read the story here when you scroll down to the “In His Own Words” section. Way to cover up for The One, SF Chronicle!

      —P.J. Gladnick is a freelance writer and creator of the DUmmie FUnnies blog.

      The Candidates reading preferences . . . October 26, 2008

      Posted by suppose in Uncategorized.
      add a comment

      I am NOT attacking a political party. We should never vote as Republicans

      OR as Democrats. We should however vote as Christians, and

      vote our convictions!

      What does Obama prefer to read?



      He is reading “The Post-American World“. It is Muslim’s view on the

      fall and collapse of the United States as a Super Power.

      WAKE UP AMERICA !!!

      What Fannie Mae did, and when October 21, 2008

      Posted by suppose in Uncategorized.
      add a comment

      September 30, 1999

      Fannie Mae Eases Credit To Aid Mortgage Lending

      By STEVEN A. HOLMES

      In a move that could help increase home ownership rates among minorities and low-income consumers, the Fannie Mae Corporation is easing the credit requirements on loans that it will purchase from banks and other lenders.
      The action, which will begin as a pilot program involving 24 banks in 15 markets — including the New York metropolitan region — will encourage those banks to extend home mortgages to individuals whose credit is generally not good enough to qualify for conventional loans.. Fannie Mae officials say they hope to make it a nationwide program by next spring.
      Fannie Mae, the nation’s biggest underwriter of home mortgages, has been under increasing pressure from the Clinton Administration to expand mortgage loans among low and moderate income people and felt pressure from stock holders to maintain its phenomenal growth in profits.
      In addition, banks, thrift institutions and mortgage companies have been pressing Fannie Mae to help them make more loans to so-called subprime borrowers. These borrowers whose incomes, credit ratings and savings are not good enough to qualify for conventional loans, can only get loans from finance companies that charge much higher interest rates — anywhere from three to four percentage points higher than conventional loans.
      ”Fannie Mae has expanded home ownership for millions of families in the 1990’s by reducing down payment requirements,” said Franklin D. Raines, Fannie Mae’s chairman and chief executive officer. ”Yet there remain too many borrowers whose credit is just a notch below what our underwriting has required who have been relegated to paying significantly higher mortgage rates in the so-called subprime market.”
      Demographic information on these borrowers is sketchy. But at least one study indicates that 18 percent of the loans in the subprime market went to black borrowers, compared to 5 per cent of lo! ans in t he conventional loan market.
      In moving, even tentatively, into this new area of lending, Fannie Mae is taking on significantly more risk, which may not pose any difficulties during flush economic times. But the government-subsidized corporation may run into trouble in an economic downturn, prompting a government rescue similar to that of the savings and loan industry in the 1980’s.
      ”From the perspective of many people, including me, this is another thrift industry growing up around us,” said Peter Wallison a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. ”If they fail, the government will have to step up and bail them out the way it stepped up and bailed out the thrift industry.”
      Under Fannie Mae’s pilot program, consumers who qualify can secure a mortgage with an interest rate one percentage point above that of a conventional, 30-year fixed rate mortgage of less than $240,000 — a rate that currently averages about 7.76 per cent. If the borrower makes his or her monthly payments on time for two years, the one percentage point premium is dropped.
      Fannie Mae, the nation’s biggest underwriter of home mortgages, does not lend money directly to consumers. Instead, it purchases loans that banks make on what is called the secondary market. By expanding the type of loans that it will buy, Fannie Mae is hoping to spur banks to make more loans to people with less-than-stellar credit ratings.

      .

      Another previously hidden story about The Annointed One October 13, 2008

      Posted by suppose in Uncategorized.
      add a comment

      Obama’s Kenya ghosts

      Jump to Comments

      HYMAN: Obama’s Kenya ghosts

      Mark Hyman

      Sunday, October 12, 2008

      About 50 parishioners were locked into the Assemblies of God church before it was set ablaze. They were mostly women and children. Those who tried to flee were hacked to death by machete-wielding members of a mob numbering 2,000.

      The 2008 New Year Day atrocity in the Kenyan village Eldoret, about 185 miles northwest of Nairobi, had all the markings of the Rwanda genocide of a decade earlier.

      By mid-February 2008, more than 1,500 Kenyans were killed. Many were slain by machete-armed attackers. More than 500,000 were displaced by the religious strife. Villages lay in ruin. Many of the atrocities were perpetrated by Muslims against Christians.

      The violence was led by supporters of Raila Odinga, the opposition leader who lost the Dec. 27, 2007, presidential election by more than 230,000 votes. Odinga supporters began the genocide hours after the final election results were announced Dec. 30. Mr. Odinga was a member of Parliament representing an area in western Kenya, heavily populated by the Luo tribe, and the birthplace of Barack Obama’s father.

      [snip]

      Initially, Mr. Odinga was not the favored opposition candidate to stand in the 2007 election against President Mwai Kibaki, who was seeking his second term. However, he received a tremendous boost when Sen. Barack Obama arrived in Kenya in August 2006 to campaign on his behalf. Mr. Obama denies that supporting Mr. Odinga was the intention of his trip, but his actions and local media reports tell otherwise.

      Mr. Odinga and Mr. Obama were nearly inseparable throughout Mr. Obama’s six-day stay. The two traveled together throughout Kenya and Mr. Obama spoke on behalf of Mr. Odinga at numerous rallies. In contrast, Mr. Obama had only criticism for Kibaki. He lashed out against the Kenyan government shortly after meeting with the president on Aug. 25. “The [Kenyan] people have to suffer over corruption perpetrated by government officials,” Mr. Obama announced.

      I tried to you tell you . . . October 13, 2008

      Posted by suppose in Uncategorized.
      add a comment

      A Rerun—–Prophecy

      A borrowed economy June 30, 2007

      Posted by suppose in Uncategorized.
      trackback , edit post

      A long time ago in our nation’s history, 1929, 98% of the people thought the stock market would continue to go up, up, up. Unlike today only a small % of Americans owned stocks. Most of those were borrowing up to a 90% margin, i.e. 10% down and pay off the rest when the stock went up. A panic began. No one was sure what caused the panic, but stocks crashed and the dollar not only dropped, it almost disappeared because no one had any, NADA!

      Thus began a national depression that really didn’t end until the middle of World War II, and even then it was none too robust. Economists at that time, at least those that had champions in Congress, decreed the way to prevent depressions was to borrow to the hilt, cheapen the dollar so plenty were around, and build a strong central government in DC so the national economy could be “managed.”

      Today the US has borrowed so much over the years[expenditures exceed income, e.g. taxes] the government must borrow, i.e. sell bonds, which raises the interest rate. This eventually causes not only inflation but a strain on the economy. Which is where we are today.

      Personal debt in the US is at an all-time high. A spending frenzy has occurred in the last few years due to housing inflation, where homeowners have found they can borrow on their home equity and pay back when they sell the house at an increased price. A very temporary boost in discretionary spending happened and borrowers used the new found wealth to buy all sorts of necessary things, like autos, second homes, vacations, all kinds of electronic and communications gadgets, etc., etc.

      Chickens have come home to roost and the price will be paid soon with increasing inflation and a drop in discretionary spending, causing business activity to fall. The big government boys in DC will respond with ever cheaper money only making inflation worse and the stock market will respond with an 1987 kind of pull back in the value of equities. This time the drop may last a lot longer and many investors will be butchered and many wage earners will struggle.

      Batten down the hatches as best you can.

      ————————————————————————————–

      The Unknown Man September 25, 2008

      Posted by suppose in Uncategorized.
      add a comment

      BLANKLEY: Media covering for Obama

      Obama remains unknown


      Wednesday, September 24, 2008

      OP-ED:

      The mainstream media have gone over the line and are now straight out propagandists for the Obama campaign. While they have been liberal and blinkered in their worldview for decades, in 2007-08 for the first time, the major media are consciously covering for one candidate for president and consciously knifing the other. This is no longer journalism — it is simply propaganda. (The American left-wing version of the Volkischer Beobachter cannot be far behind.) And as a result, we are less than seven weeks away from possibly electing a president who has not been thoroughly and even half way honestly presented to the country by our watchdogs — the press.

      The image of Barack Obama that the press has presented is not a fair approximation of the real man. They have consciously ignored whole years in his life, and showed a lack of curiosity about such gaps that bespeaks a lack of journalistic instinct. Thus, the public image of Mr. Obama is of a “Man who never was.” I take that phrase from a 1956 movie about a real life WWII British intelligence operation to trick the Germans into thinking the Allies were going to invade Greece, rather than Italy, in 1943. Operation “Mincemeat” involved the acquisition of a human corpse dressed as a Maj. William Martin, R.M. and put into the sea near Spain. Attached to the corpse was a brief-case containing fake letters suggesting that the Allied attack would be against Sardinia and Greece.

      To make the operation credible, British intelligence created a fictional life for the corpse — a letter from a lover, tickets to a London theater, all the details of a life — but not the actual life of the dead young man whose corpse was being used. So, too, the man the media has presented to the nation as Mr. Obama is not the real man.

      The mainstream media ruthlessly and endlessly repeats any McCain gaffes, while ignoring Obama gaffes. You have to go to weird little Internet sites to see all the stammering and stuttering that Mr. Obama needs before getting out a sentence fragment or two. But all you see on the networks is an eventual one or two clear sentences from Mr. Obama. Nor do you see Mr. Obama’s ludicrous gaffe that Iran is a tiny country and no threat to us. Nor his 57 American states gaffe. Nor his forgetting, if he ever knew, that Russia has a veto in the United Nations. Nor his whining and puerile “come on” when he is being challenged. This is the kind of editing one would expect from Goebbels’ disciples, not Cronkite’s.

      More appalling, NBC’s “Saturday Night Live” suggested that Gov. Sarah Palin’s husband had sex with his own daughters. That scene was written with the assistance of Al Franken, Democratic Party candidate for Senate in Minnesota. Talk about incest.

      Democratic presidential candidate Sen.Barack Obama, D-Ill., greets supporters before his speech in downtown Charlotte, North Carolina on September 21, 2008. (UPI Photo/Nell Redmond)

      But worse than all the unfair and distorted reporting and image projecting, is the shocking gaps in Mr. Obama’s life that are not reported at all. The major media simply has not reported on Mr. Obama’s two years at Columbia University in New York, where, among other things, he lived a mere quarter mile from former terrorist Bill Ayers— after which they both ended up as neighbors and associates in Chicago. Mr. Obama denies more than a passing relationship with Mr. Ayers. Should the media be curious? In only two weeks the media has focused on all the colleges Mrs. Palin has attended, her husband’s driving habits 20 years ago and the close criticism of Mrs. Palin’s mayoral political opponents. But in two years they haven’t bothered to see how close Mr. Obama was with the terrorist Ayers.

      Nor have the media paid any serious attention to Mr. Obama’s rise in Chicago politics — how did honest Obama rise in the famously sordid Chicago political machine with the full support of Boss Daley? Despite the great — and unflattering details on Mr. Obama’s Chicago years presented in David Freddoso’s new book, the mainstream media continues to ignore both the facts and the book. It took a British publication, the Economist, to give Mr. Freddoso’s book a review with fair comment.

      The public image of Mr. Obama as an idealistic, post-race, post-partisan, well-spoken and honest young man with the wisdom and courage befitting a great national leader is a confection spun by a willing conspiracy of Mr. Obama, his publicist David Axelrod and most of the senior editors, producers and reporters of the national media.

      Perhaps that is why the National Journal’s respected correspondent Stuart Taylor has written that “the media can no longer be trusted to provide accurate and fair campaign reporting and analysis.” That conspiracy has not only photo-shopped out all of Mr. Obama’s imperfections (and dirtied up his opponent Mr. McCain’s image), but it has put most of his questionable history down the memory hole.

      The public will be voting based on the idealized image of the man who never was. If he wins, however, we will be governed by the sunken, cynical man Mr. Obama really is. One can only hope that the senior journalists will be judged as harshly for their professional misconduct as Wall Street’s leaders currently are for their failings.

      Tony Blankley is a syndicated columnist.

      der_widget(url) { var ct=”; var temp = document.getElementsByTagName(‘title’); if (temp!=null && temp.length>0) {ct=temp[0].text;} document.write(‘<scr’+'ipt type=”text/javascript” src=”‘+url+’&ctxu=’+escape(document.location)+’&ctxt=’+escape(ct)+’”></scr’+'ipt>’); } yedda_render_widget(“http://yedda.com/api/widgets/?d=517&mt=4&mt.qht=BLANKLEY: Media covering for Obama”);
      Get Answers From the Community
      Got a question about BLANKLEY: Media covering for Obama? Type your question here…

      Financial Meltdown-The Root Cause September 23, 2008

      Posted by suppose in Uncategorized.
      add a comment

      THE REAL CULPRITS IN THIS MELTDOWN
      By Investor’s Business Daily
      Posted Monday, September 15, 2008 4:20 PM PT
      Big Government: Barack Obama and Democrats blame the historic financial turmoil on the market. But if it’s dysfunctional, Democrats during the Clinton years are a prime reason for it.

      Obama in a statement yesterday blamed the shocking new round of subprime-related bankruptcies on the free-market system, and specifically the “trickle-down” economics of the Bush administration, which he tried to gig opponent John McCain for wanting to extend.

      But it was the Clinton administration, obsessed with multiculturalism, that dictated where mortgage lenders could lend, and originally helped create the market for the high-risk subprime loans now infecting like a retrovirus the balance sheets of many of Wall Street’s most revered institutions.

      Tough new regulations forced lenders into high-risk areas where they had no choice but to lower lending standards to make the loans that sound business practices had previously guarded against making. It was either that or face stiff government penalties.

      The untold story in this whole national crisis is that President Clinton put on steroids the Community Redevelopment Act, a well-intended Carter-era law designed to encourage minority homeownership. And in so doing, he helped create the market for the risky subprime loans that he and Democrats now decry as not only greedy but “predatory.”

      Yes, the market was fueled by greed and overleveraging in the secondary market for subprimes, vis-a-vis mortgaged-backed securities traded on Wall Street. But the seed was planted in the ’90s by Clinton and his social engineers. They were the political catalyst behind this slow-motion financial train wreck.

      And it was the Clinton administration that mismanaged the quasi-governmental agencies that over the decades have come to manage the real estate market in America.

      As soon as Clinton crony Franklin Delano Raines took the helm in 1999 at Fannie Mae, for example, he used it as his personal piggy bank, looting it for a total of almost $100 million in compensation by the time he left in early 2005 under an ethical cloud.

      Other Clinton cronies, including Janet Reno aide Jamie Gorelick, padded their pockets to the tune of another $75 million.

      Raines was accused of overstating earnings and shifting losses so he and other senior executives could earn big bonuses.

      In the end, Fannie had to pay a record $400 million civil fine for SEC and other violations, while also agreeing as part of a settlement to make changes in its accounting procedures and ways of managing risk.

      But it was too little, too late. Raines had reportedly steered Fannie Mae business to subprime giant Countrywide Financial, which was saved from bankruptcy by Bank of America.

      At the same time, the Clinton administration was pushing Fannie and her brother Freddie Mac to buy more mortgages from low-income households.

      The Clinton-era corruption, combined with unprecedented catering to affordable-housing lobbyists, resulted in today’s nationalization of both Fannie and Freddie, a move that is expected to cost taxpayers tens of billions of dollars.

      And the worst is far from over. By the time it is, we’ll all be paying for Clinton’s social experiment, one that Obama hopes to trump with a whole new round of meddling in the housing and jobs markets. In fact, the social experiment Obama has planned could dwarf both the Great Society and New Deal in size and scope.

      There’s a political root cause to this mess that we ignore at our peril. If we blame the wrong culprits, we’ll learn the wrong lessons. And taxpayers will be on the hook for even larger bailouts down the road.

      But the government-can-do-no-wrong crowd just doesn’t get it. They won’t acknowledge the law of unintended consequences from well-meaning, if misguided, acts.

      Obama and Democrats on the Hill think even more regulation and more interference in the market will solve the problem their policies helped cause. For now, unarmed by the historic record, conventional wisdom is buying into their blame-business-first rhetoric and bigger-government solutions.

      While government arguably has a role in helping low-income folks buy a home, Clinton went overboard by strong-arming lenders with tougher and tougher regulations, which only led to lenders taking on hundreds of billions in subprime bilge.

      Market failure? Hardly. Once again, this crisis has government’s fingerprints all over it.


      **************



      A Forgotten Promise September 5, 2008

      Posted by suppose in Uncategorized.
      add a comment

      |
      | Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social Security (FICA)                            |
      | Program.                                                                                          |
      | He promised:                                                                                      |
      |                                                                                                  |
      | 1.) That participation in the Program would be completely voluntary,                              |
      |                                                                                                  |
      | 2.) That the participants would only have to pay 1% of the first $1,400 of                        |
      | Their annual incomes into the Program,                                                            |
      |                                                                                                  |
      | 3.) That the money the participants elected to put into the Program would be                      |
      | Deductible from their income for tax purposes each year,                                          |
      |                                                                                                  |
      | 4.) That the money the participants put into the independent ‘Trust Fund’                        |
      | Rather than into the General operating fund, and therefore,                                      |
      | Would only be used to fund the Social Security Retirement Program, and no                        |
      | Other Government program, and,                                                                    |
      |                                                                                                  |
      | 5.) That the annuity payments to the e retirees would never be taxed as income                    |
      |                                                                                                  |
      | ——————————————————————-                              |
      |                                                                                                  |
      |                                                                                                  |
      | Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are now receiving a                            |
      | Social Security check every month –                                                              |
      | And then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of the money we paid to                        |
      | The Federal government to ‘put                                                                    |
      | Away — you may be interested in the following:                                                  |
      | ————————————————————-                                    |
      |                                                                                                  |
      | Q: Which Political Party took Social Security from the independent ‘Trust                        |
      | Fund’ and put it into the General fund so that Congress could spend it?                          |
      | A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the democratically controlled House and Senate.                      |
      |                                                                                                  |
      | — —————————————————————–                            |
      | Q: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax deduction for Social                          |
      | Security (FICA) withholding?                                                                      |
      |                                                                                                  |
      | A: The Democratic Party.                                                                          |
      | —————————————————————– ——                          |
      | Q: Which Political Party started taxing Social Security annuities????                            |
      | A: The Democratic Party, with Al Gore casting the ‘tie-breaking’ deciding                        |
      | Vote as President of the Senate, while he was Vice President of the US .                          |
      |                                                                                                  |
      | ——————————————————————-                              |
      |                                                                                                  |
      | Q: Which Political Party decided to start giving annuity payments to                              |
      | Immigrants?                                                                                      |
      |                                                                                                  |
      | This is MY FAVORITE:                                                                              |
      |                                                                                                  |
      | A: That’s right! Jimmy Carter! And the Democratic Party of course!                                |
      | Immigrants moved into this country, and at age 65, began to receive Social                        |
      | Security payments!                                                                                |
      | The Democratic Party gave these payments to them, even though they never                          |
      | Paid a dime into it!                                                                              |
      | ———————————————————————-                            |
      |                                                                                                  |
      | Then, after doing all this lying and thieving and violating of the original                      |
      | Contract (FICA),                                                                                  |
      | The Democrats turn around and tell you that the Republicans want to take                          |
      | Your Social Security away!                                                                        |
      | And the worst part about it is uninformed citizens believe it!                                    |
      | ==============================================                                                    |
      | If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of awareness will be planted and                      |
      | Maybe changes will evolve.                                                                        |
      | Maybe not!.. Many Democrats are awfully sure of what isn’t so!!                                  |
      |                                                                                                  |
      | But it’s worth a try. How many people can YOU send this to?                                      |
      | Actions speak louder than bumper stickers.                                                        |
      | |
      |—————————————————————————————————|